Privacy in Web3: The article The Significance of Privacy in Web3 will explore how privacy evolves with decentralized technologies and why protecting confidentiality is central to the Web3 ecosystem.

Privacy has always been an issue in Web2, the internet as we know it today. Users are consistently subjected to instances of identity theft, wanton data harvesting and unsolicited tracking. A 2023 Pew Research report reveals that more than 80% of American adults feel they have no say in how much data the government and private companies collect on them.

However, Web3 brings new hope for data privacy-conscious individuals. Unlike traditional web platforms, Web3 architecture is geared toward enhancing user privacy. But is the promise of Web3 data privacy real, or is it overblown? This article examines the gravity of data sovereignty in Web3.

The history of blockchain and privacy in Web3

The main characteristic (and drawback) of Web2 frameworks is data centralization. Big companies like Facebook, Google and Apple collect users’ data and store it in a central repository. Users cannot monitor it and have little say over its usage, ceding near total control to the companies and the government to use the data as they will.

On the other hand, the foundations of Web3 tout it as the decentralized version of the internet, promising secure data exchange since the notion of security and data privacy is hard-baked into its architecture. Web3 uses the blockchain and, with the help of artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT), ensures a decentralized and private browsing experience.

The semantic web allows users full control over their personal information and data while browsing the internet. The push toward Web3 decentralized identity and storage allows users to have more say in the development of the network while maintaining anonymity and data privacy.

The impact of Web3 on privacy

Users can expect the following decentralized privacy solutions:

User identity protection in Web3

Web3 enables decentralized identity (DIDs) to give users control over their identities. DIDs support identifying people for verification purposes without revealing their identities, so there’s no need for centralized identity providers.

Polygon ID leverages DIDs and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to enable identity verification without compromising privacy. Users don’t need to rely on centralized identity providers and maintain full control over their data. Individuals can use these tools to prove who they are without revealing personal data. Integration of these encryption technologies in Web3 allows users to share their identities only when they wish to.

Web3 allows the deployment of AI and KYC tools to scan the network for malicious activity. The tools perform keyword filtering, background research and real-time digital footprint analysis to prevent breaches.

Another emerging technology is self-sovereign identity (SSI). It lets users choose what to store as their digital identifiers in public and decentralized servers. This way, users can control what data they need to reveal to validators to facilitate identification without relying on centralized authorities.

Ring signatures are cryptographic protocols for making anonymous group digital signatures. A member can sign anonymously on behalf of the other group members without revealing the member’s key used during the signing.

Personal data security in Web3

Users can utilize privacy-centric smart contracts to prove ownership of digital assets. The immutability of smart contracts means owners can encode their ownership details in the contracts for a verifiable ownership claim. Developments are focused on allowing smart contracts to facilitate private computations without revealing personal user data.

In response to differencing attacks, some networks employ differential privacy. It is a technique that adds noise to data to protect it. The technique still allows for the collection and analysis of the data while protecting any individuals’ data run through the analysis.

Another cryptographic technique is secure multiparty computation (SMPC), which enables multiple parties to commence joint computation of input data while maintaining the input’s privacy. With SMPC, parties can analyze sensitive data in a distributed manner without revealing the sensitive data during collaborative computations.

Users can even rely on privacy-focused decentralized application storage solutions like Storj, a decentralized storage platform where users can store, retrieve and share their data securely.

Web3 privacy protocols

The Web3 ecosystem leverages privacy-first technologies that enhance its safety. These include innovations like zero-knowledge proofs in Web3 that allow users to prove they know a statement is true without revealing more information about it.

Enigma allows computation on encrypted data. It relies on homomorphic encryption, a type of cryptographic technique allowing computation without decrypting encrypted data. The results of the computation on the encrypted data, when decrypted, will match the results of the computation on the unencrypted data.

Secure hash functions (SHFs) generate a unique, fixed-size hash value representing input data. A blockchain system contains a chain of blocks secured by hash functions created by blocks that have a hash of the previous block, maintaining the immutability of records. Any data change in a block alters its hash and alerts the rest of the network about this anomalous change.

As for payments, the Interledger Protocol allows for payments of assets within and between blockchains without revealing users’ personal information. Mimblewimble is another technology used in Web3 and private transactions. It utilizes cryptographic commitments to make transactions verifiable without revealing the amounts transferred in the transaction, hiding information about amounts transacted, which is usually displayed on a blockchain.

Privacy challenges in Web3

While privacy regulations and Web3 may seem to read from the same script, privacy regulations may introduce new decrees that must be implemented into the development of Web3 applications. The United States lacks a comprehensive federal privacy regulation. This results in a patchwork of varying state-level laws. A major challenge for businesses is ensuring applications comply with this complex landscape of potentially conflicting regulations across all 50 states (and likely more as additional states enact their own laws).

The most common challenges faced in Web3 are phishing scams and rug pulls, with attacks most prevalent on private blockchains. Private networks have fewer validators than public blockchains, which have more participants, keeping them safe from bad actors.

Further, Web3 is based on the current peer-to-peer (P2P) network internet protocol (IP), which has inherent privacy issues. Using Bitcoin as an example, a third party can retrace a user’s transactions by linking their public address to an IP address and unveiling the identity and location of that user using IP-tracking tools. This allows them to view that user’s entire transaction history in the public domain.

The future of anonymity in the decentralized web

The future of confidentiality in blockchain networks appears to be on the right track. Unlike Web2, which allows Big Tech companies and the government to collect and profit from users’ data without their consent, Web3 restores control of the data to the individual it belongs to.

This could usher in an era of enhanced internet anonymity. The future of privacy in Web3 is likely to comprise evolving user privacy needs and government regulations satisfied by privacy-centric technological advancements. Web3 projects will probably integrate privacy during development while following an established unified data protection approach.

For instance, integrating technologies like smart contracts that allow computations while concealing user data is useful in industries requiring secure private data handling, such as finance and healthcare.

Solving weaknesses in IP-based networks could lie in switching from IP-based to content-based networks (CBN). While IP-based networks rely primarily on identifying the IP address linked to the message, CBN-based networks rely on the information contained in the message to verify the user’s identity, preventing potential IP-based attacks and limiting access to personal information.

Original Source